Aktív témák

• #7939 lugosi MODERÁTOR lugosi #7938

  2008-12-31 12:12:32 #7939

  Összes hozzászólása itt Válaszok az összes hozzászólására itt Válaszok erre a hozzászólásra

  Privát üzenet küldése

  

  lugosi

  MODERÁTOR

  válasz lugosi #7938 üzenetére

  Még annyit a témához, hogy valószínű nem tévedtem olyan nagyot mikor azt mondtam, hogy a 18-55 + 55-200 lenne a jó választás. Thom Hogan, aki azért egy kicsit többet ért a dolgokhoz nikon és egyéb fotós témában mint mi, szintén ezt javasolja:

  szerk.: Ja, az "Economy DX" szekciót néztem.

  http://www.bythom.com/rationallenses.htm

  Here’s the low-cost portfolio that makes sense to me:

  18-55mm f/3.5-5.6G AF-S VR (not yet reviewed on this site)
  55-200mm f/4-5.6G AF-S VR

  What you give up in the economy kit is low-light capability. Both these lenses use 52mm filters, which means you can standardize on a small filter set. You’re going to use the 18-55mm on the camera most of the time, swapping in the 55-200mm when you need real telephoto. These lenses are far better than you'd expect for their low cost. Indeed, each generation of the 18-55mm has improved to the point where the VR version has little to complain about. What you have is near state-of-the-art optics between 18mm and 70mm. At f/8 and f/11 and those focal lengths, this kit can produce results pretty much on par with the more expensive lenses you covet. Even at 200mm the results hold up quite well, though they're not state-of-the-art. Neither of these lenses is much prone to chromatic aberration, and neither has high levels of linear distortion. Both tend to have significant light fall-off wide open, but it rapidly drops to acceptable. The VR works, and the AF-S makes for reasonably snappy focus. Let me put it another way: in terms of image quality, these two low-cost lenses have very little to complain about. They produce very nice images.

  [ Szerkesztve ]

Aktív témák